|
AFTERMATH:
While the press
revels in the Allies defeat of Germany, they fail to report that
Hitler has achieved a gruesome victory: he has won the war against
the Jews. Two-thirds of Europes Jews are dead, and those who
survive have little left but the clothes on their backs. The Nuremberg
trials reveal the incredible brutality of the Nazis "Final
Solution" but the plight of the Jews soon fades from the publics
consciousness, as the cold war takes center stage.
The word "
Holocaust" with a capital H does not even enter our vocabulary
until the 1970s. Public attention turns to the survivors of
the Holocaust after an NBC miniseries in 1978. The opening of the
U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum, and the film "Schindlers
List" renew interest during the 1990s. In the years 1995
and 1996, the New York Times ran 532 Holocaust related stories,
many on the front page. This compares to just 1100 stories from
1939 to 1945. The New York Times publicly admited its Holocaust
coverage was "grossly inadequate."
Eventually scholars
gain access to formerly top secret government files, and uncover
the United States role in the Holocaust: that of passive bystander.
While it is tempting to place the blame on President Roosevelt,
the government had conflicting responsibilities, both foreign and
domestic. The press had only one job: to seek and tell the truth.
The haunting question remains could a more aggressive press
have saved lives? Many historians agree that if the press, especially
the New York Times, had consistently put the reports of Jewish
slaughter on the front page, and championed the cause of rescue,
that many lives could have been saved.
More recent
massacres and genocides in Asia, Africa and Eastern Europe have
called attention to the role the media play in focusing public attention
on atrocities. When extensive press coverage ignites public outrage
over mass killings, governments take action. When the press ignores
or downplays atrocities, little is done to help the victims. It
is the presss responsibility to report the news fairly and
accurately, and to give it the attention it deserves. In the case
of the Holocaust, the press failed to meet its responsibility.
|